2024 Update to the Declaration of Helsinki – Relevance for Clinical Trials and Ethical Standards

2024 Update to the Declaration of Helsinki – Relevance for Clinical Trials and Ethical Standards

The Declaration of Helsinki, the globally recognised foundation for ethical guidelines in medical research involving human participants, was updated in October 2024. This revision is important for those working in clinical research, including clinical trial sponsors, researchers, and CROs like Datapharm Australia. Staying current with these changes is vital to ensure that research practices align with international standards, including ICH Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Australia’s NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research.

Herein we will examine the latest update to the Declaration of Helsinki and how it impacts clinical trials, ethical oversight, and data integrity, as well as its alignment with both ICH GCP and national Australian ethical standards.

Overview of the Declaration of Helsinki

First adopted in 1964 by the World Medical Association (WMA), the Declaration of Helsinki outlines ethical principles for conducting medical research with human participants. The document is crucial for protecting research participants’ rights and ensuring ethical integrity throughout the research process. Over the years, the Declaration has been revised several times, with the latest changes in 2024 addressing emerging concerns in the field of medical research.

Key Updates in 2024

The 2024 update introduces new ethical considerations that reflect current challenges in global medical research:

  1. Increased Focus on Vulnerable Populations: The update stresses the inclusion of underrepresented or vulnerable groups in medical research. It highlights the ethical imperative to avoid perpetuating health disparities by excluding these groups from the potential benefits of clinical research, while ensuring that they are provided with adequate protections to prevent exploitation​. The update also acknowledges the differing levels of vulnerability - individual, group, and community - and that vulnerability may be either fixed or dynamic.
  2. Environmental Sustainability: One of the most notable new elements is the focus on the environmental impact of medical research. The Declaration now urges researchers to consider and minimise harm to the environment, integrating sustainability principles into clinical research practices​.
  3. Scientific Integrity: The 2024 Declaration also reinforces the need for scientific rigour and integrity in trial design and execution, ensuring that medical research results are reliable and valid. Recommended information that should be included in Study Protocols was expanded to reflect this. The update also emphasises a need to avoid research waste.
  4. Language changes: The Update to the Declaration incorporates several changes in language to better convey the role and responsibilities of those involved in medical research. The Declaration now adopts the usage of the term “participant” to better reflect the rights, agency, and importance of these individuals. In addition, the update includes reference to all researchers involved in medical research, not just physicians, to emphasise the responsibility of all individuals, teams, and organisations to uphold the principles outlined by the Declaration.
  5. Informed Consent: The update to the Declaration adopted the use of “Free and Informed Consent” to replace “Informed Consent”, to better reflect the autonomy of participants. Along with this, essential information to be provided to participants was updated to align with changes to requirements of Study Protocols. The Declaration now acknowledges the increasingly common electronic methods of documenting informed consent.
  6. Data Security and Privacy: Given the rise of artificial intelligence and machine learning, and the increased risk of re-identification of stored participant data, the Declaration of Helsinki now includes reference to the WMA Declaration of Taipei and its requirements on rights of individuals and principles of governance relating to health databases and biobanks. The update to the Declaration of Helsinki emphasises a need for free and informed consent relating to the collection of biological material and data, and oversight from research ethics committees in the use of health databases and biobanks.
  7. Ethics Committees: The update to the Declaration highlighted the need for research ethics committees to have authority, be independent, and well resourced. It also outlined that committees should include adequately educated, trained, and qualified members to evaluate research effectively. There was also an emphasis on diversity and inclusion of at least one member of the general public on committees. The update also included a stipulation that international research must be approved by research ethics committees in both the sponsoring and host countries.

Relevance to ICH Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Clinical Trials

The updated Declaration of Helsinki closely aligns with the ICH GCP standards, which govern the ethical and scientific quality of clinical trials. Both frameworks share the fundamental goal of protecting participants and ensuring credible, accurate trial data. 

The responsibility to protect vulnerable populations also reflects GCP principles. By addressing underrepresented groups and including considerations for their specific health needs, the Declaration adds an important dimension to the design and conduct of clinical trials, ensuring fairness and justice in research participation.

For Datapharm Australia, adhering to these principles is critical in ensuring that clinical trials meet both international and national ethical standards. Compliance with the updated Declaration ensures that all research conducted adheres to the highest ethical principles, promoting participant welfare and the integrity of the scientific process.

Alignment with the NHMRC National Statement

Australia’s NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research serves as the ethical framework for conducting human research in the country. The updated Declaration of Helsinki, particularly its focus on informed consent and transparency, aligns well with the NHMRC National Statement. Both documents place a strong emphasis on informed consent, ensuring that participants fully understand the nature of the research and the risks involved before agreeing to participate.

The 2024 Declaration’s inclusion of environmental sustainability may also complement emerging discussions in Australia around responsible research practices, with an increasing emphasis placed on sustainability in all sectors.

Moreover, the Declaration’s emphasis on Research Ethics Committees (RECs) mirrors the NHMRC’s requirements for Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs). These committees play a critical role in reviewing research protocols and ensuring that clinical trials meet ethical standards. They ensure that trials are designed to minimise risk, protect vulnerable populations, and handle ethical challenges appropriately.

Why This Matters for Clinical Trials in Australia

For clinical trial sponsors and researchers in Australia, like those working with Datapharm Australia, the 2024 Declaration of Helsinki offers an enhanced framework for conducting ethical research. By aligning with these international standards, trial sponsors ensure that their studies meet the highest ethical benchmarks, which is crucial for obtaining regulatory approvals and maintaining public trust in clinical research.

The updated Declaration underscores the importance of balancing scientific progress with ethical responsibility. As clinical trials continue to expand globally, particularly in vulnerable and resource-limited settings, ensuring that all research is conducted in line with the latest ethical principles is more important than ever.

Conclusion

The 2024 update to the Declaration of Helsinki introduces crucial changes that enhance the ethical framework for medical research. For organisations like Datapharm Australia, these updates underscore the importance of maintaining ethical oversight and aligning clinical trial practices with international guidelines, including ICH GCP and the NHMRC National Statement. By adhering to these evolving ethical standards, clinical trials can ensure the protection of participants, the integrity of scientific data, and the advancement of medical knowledge in a sustainable and ethical manner.

For more information about how Datapharm can support your clinical trial needs while ensuring compliance with the updated Declaration of Helsinki and other ethical frameworks, please contact us.

External Links:
https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki/
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2825290

Recent Posts